2009 Ford Maverick vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Ford Maverick is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,987 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Maverick (122 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Maverick should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Maverick weights approximately 745 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Maverick (175 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Maverick will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Maverick | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Maverick | 102 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1987 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2160 mm |