2009 Ford Maverick vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Ford Maverick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Ford Maverick would be higher. At 2,288 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 148 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 2009 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Maverick. (200 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Maverick | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Maverick | Epica |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2288 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 200 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
