2009 Ford Mondeo vs. 1980 Volvo 265
To start off, 2009 Ford Mondeo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,315 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mondeo (159 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 265. (82 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 265. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 60 kg more than 1980 Volvo 265. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Volvo 265 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 265. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Mondeo (208 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 265. (145 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 265.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Mondeo | 1980 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Mondeo | 265 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2315 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 159 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 208 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 23.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 58 L |