2009 Ford Mondeo vs. 2004 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Ford Mondeo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mondeo (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 229 kg more than 2004 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Mondeo (190 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 3. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Ford Mondeo 2004 Mazda 3
Make Ford Mazda
Model Mondeo 3
Year Released 2009 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1999 cc 1596 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 143 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 190 Nm 148 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1369 kg 1140 kg
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 7.9 L/100km 7.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 55 L