2009 Ford Mondeo vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2009 Ford Mondeo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2009 Ford Mondeo. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Mondeo.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Mondeo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Mondeo (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Mondeo | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Mondeo | Colt |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2972 cc |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 255 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 91.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.9:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 205 km/hour | 169 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.9 L/100km | 12.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 95 L |