2009 Ford Mustang vs. 1952 Ford Crestline
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 370 kg more than 2009 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Mustang | 1952 Ford Crestline | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Mustang | Crestline |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4606 cc | 3929 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2940 mm |
