2009 Ford Mustang vs. 1954 Chevrolet Corvette
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1954 Chevrolet Corvette. (150 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1954 Chevrolet Corvette. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Chevrolet Corvette weights approximately 183 kg more than 2009 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Mustang | 1954 Chevrolet Corvette | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Mustang | Corvette |
Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 3859 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1293 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 60 L |