2009 Ford Mustang vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Mustang weights approximately 226 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Mustang | 1962 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Mustang | 8 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4009 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2280 mm |
