2009 Ford Mustang vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 204 kg more than 2009 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Mustang (326 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Mustang | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Mustang | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 326 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 64 L |
