2009 Ford Mustang vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 204 kg more than 2009 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Mustang (434 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Mustang | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Mustang | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 434 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 64 L |