2009 Ford Mustang vs. 1973 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (395 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 277 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Mustang (240 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Mustang | 1973 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Mustang | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2480 mm |