2009 Ford Mustang vs. 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 979 kg more than 2009 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Mustang | 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Mustang | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4009 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 2150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3160 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 107 L |