2009 Ford Mustang vs. 1976 Peugeot 104
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Peugeot 104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Peugeot 104 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (395 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 315 more horse power than 1976 Peugeot 104. (80 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1976 Peugeot 104.
Because 2009 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Peugeot 104, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Mustang (240 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Peugeot 104. (109 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Peugeot 104. 2009 Ford Mustang has automatic transmission and 1976 Peugeot 104 has manual transmission. 1976 Peugeot 104 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Mustang will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Mustang | 1976 Peugeot 104 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | Mustang | 104 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 80 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 109 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3380 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2240 mm |