2009 Ford Mustang vs. 1976 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Mustang weights approximately 316 kg more than 1976 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Mustang | 1976 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Mustang | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
| Engine Size | 4009 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2010 mm |
