2009 Ford Mustang vs. 1977 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Mustang weights approximately 351 kg more than 1977 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2009 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Mustang | 1977 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Mustang | Colt |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2310 mm |
