2009 Ford Mustang vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (395 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 346 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Mustang (240 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Mustang | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Mustang | 102 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2160 mm |