2009 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Toyota Celica

To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (103 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Celica weights approximately 210 kg more than 2009 Ford Mustang.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Mustang (325 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (157 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Ford Mustang 1982 Toyota Celica
Make Ford Toyota
Model Mustang Celica
Year Released 2009 1982
Body Type Convertible Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4009 cc 1972 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 210 HP 103 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 325 Nm 157 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 966 kg 1176 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2620 mm