2009 Ford Mustang vs. 1997 Isuzu 3.1
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Isuzu 3.1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Isuzu 3.1 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 Isuzu 3.1 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Isuzu 3.1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Isuzu 3.1 has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2009 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Isuzu 3.1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Mustang | 1997 Isuzu 3.1 | |
| Make | Ford | Isuzu |
| Model | Mustang | 3.1 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4604 cc | 3098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
