2009 Ford Mustang vs. 1997 Nissan 400 R

To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Nissan 400 R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Nissan 400 R would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Nissan 400 R (400 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2009 Ford Mustang. (395 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Nissan 400 R should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Mustang.

Because 1997 Nissan 400 R is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Nissan 400 R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Nissan 400 R (471 Nm) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Mustang. (240 Nm). This means 1997 Nissan 400 R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Mustang. 2009 Ford Mustang has automatic transmission and 1997 Nissan 400 R has manual transmission. 1997 Nissan 400 R will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Mustang will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Ford Mustang 1997 Nissan 400 R
Make Ford Nissan
Model Mustang 400 R
Year Released 2009 1997
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4600 cc 2768 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 395 HP 400 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 240 Nm 471 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4680 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 2720 mm