2009 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 37 kg more than 2009 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Mustang (325 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2009 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Mustang | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Mustang | Equator |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3260 mm |
