2009 Ford Mustang vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2001 Nissan MM. (153 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan MM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 869 kg more than 2009 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan MM (372 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Mustang. (325 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan MM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Mustang. 2001 Nissan MM has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2009 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan MM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Mustang | 2001 Nissan MM | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Mustang | MM |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4009 cc | 2956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 372 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1835 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 1530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 106 L |