2009 Ford Mustang vs. 2002 Lincoln Blackwood
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lincoln Blackwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lincoln Blackwood would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Lincoln Blackwood is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lincoln Blackwood weights approximately 1389 kg more than 2009 Ford Mustang.
Because 2002 Lincoln Blackwood is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Blackwood will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Mustang | 2002 Lincoln Blackwood | |
| Make | Ford | Lincoln |
| Model | Mustang | Blackwood |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4009 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 2355 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 85 L |
