2009 Ford Mustang vs. 2003 Renault Megane

To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Megane would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane.

Because 2009 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Mustang (325 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (127 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Ford Mustang 2003 Renault Megane
Make Ford Renault
Model Mustang Megane
Year Released 2009 2003
Body Type Convertible Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4009 cc 1389 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 210 HP 97 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 325 Nm 127 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2690 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 70 L