2009 Ford Mustang vs. 2003 Tata Indica
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Tata Indica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Tata Indica would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 2003 Tata Indica. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2003 Tata Indica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Mustang weights approximately 241 kg more than 2003 Tata Indica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Tata Indica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Mustang (325 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Tata Indica. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Tata Indica.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Mustang | 2003 Tata Indica | |
Make | Ford | Tata |
Model | Mustang | Indica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2410 mm |