2009 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-350. (255 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Mustang weights approximately 440 kg more than 2004 Ford E-350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Mustang. (434 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Mustang | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Mustang | E-350 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4606 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 255 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 434 Nm | 475 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2862 kg | 2422 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 2120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 132 L |
