2009 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Ford F-150
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (380 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 2009 Ford Mustang. (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-150 weights approximately 152 kg more than 2009 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (610 Nm) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Mustang. (325 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Mustang | 2004 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | F-150 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4009 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 380 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 610 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 8.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 1323 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 95 L |