2009 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Rover 75

To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (395 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 2004 Rover 75. (256 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 Rover 75.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Rover 75 (418 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Mustang. (240 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Mustang.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Ford Mustang 2004 Rover 75
Make Ford Rover
Model Mustang 75
Year Released 2009 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4600 cc 4601 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 395 HP 256 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 240 Nm 418 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 9.4:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4760 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 2780 mm
Fuel Consumption 9.8 L/100km 10.5 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 14.7 L/100km 18.3 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 54 L