2009 Ford Mustang vs. 2010 Mazda 3

To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 3.

Because 2009 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Mustang (326 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Ford Mustang 2010 Mazda 3
Make Ford Mazda
Model Mustang 3
Year Released 2009 2010
Body Type Convertible Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4009 cc 1560 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 210 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 326 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 5-speed manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2639 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 55 L