2009 Ford Mustang vs. 2012 Opel Ampera
To start off, 2012 Opel Ampera is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Ford Mustang would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Opel Ampera weights approximately 749 kg more than 2009 Ford Mustang.
Because 2009 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Ampera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Mustang | 2012 Opel Ampera | |
| Make | Ford | Opel |
| Model | Mustang | Ampera |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4498 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1438 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2685 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 2.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 2.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 35 L |
