2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1942 Skoda Polular 995
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Skoda Polular 995. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Skoda Polular 995 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1942 Skoda Polular 995. (22 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1942 Skoda Polular 995. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 236 kg more than 1942 Skoda Polular 995. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ranger | 1942 Skoda Polular 995 | |
Make | Ford | Skoda |
Model | Ranger | Polular 995 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1942 |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 22 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1490 mm |