2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1960 Ford Popular
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Popular. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Popular would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (141 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1960 Ford Popular. (31 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1960 Ford Popular. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1120 kg more than 1960 Ford Popular. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Ford Popular. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Ranger | 1960 Ford Popular | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Ranger | Popular |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 31 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2220 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |
