2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1961 Renault 4
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1961 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1961 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 316 kg more than 1961 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Ranger | 1961 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Ranger | 4 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2410 mm |
