2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (141 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 920 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ranger (330 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Ranger | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Ranger | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2540 mm |
