2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1964 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1964 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1964 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 8 kg more than 2009 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ranger (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ranger | 1964 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Ford | Isuzu |
Model | Ranger | Minx |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1022 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 40 L |