2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 30 kg more than 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire.
Because 2009 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Ranger | 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Ranger | Starfire |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |
