2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1965 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1965 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1965 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 6 kg more than 1965 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ranger | 1965 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Ford | Wartburg |
Model | Ranger | 312 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 6.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 43 L |