2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1967 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Pontiac Firebird (255 HP) has 114 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ranger. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Pontiac Firebird should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 190 kg more than 1967 Pontiac Firebird.
Because 2009 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Pontiac Firebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ranger | 1967 Pontiac Firebird | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | Ranger | Firebird |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 255 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2750 mm |