2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (141 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 962 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Riley Kestrel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ranger (330 Nm) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ranger | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Ford | Riley |
Model | Ranger | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 83 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 888 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 25 L |