2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1971 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1971 Holden Belmont. (116 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1971 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Holden Belmont weights approximately 374 kg more than 2009 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Holden Belmont (228 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1971 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ranger | 1971 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Ranger | Belmont |
Year Released | 2009 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2833 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2830 mm |