2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1971 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 26 kg more than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ranger | 1971 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1971 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2210 mm |