2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1976 Zastava 132
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (141 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 132. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 755 kg more than 1976 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Zastava 132. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ranger (330 Nm) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Zastava 132. (142 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ranger | 1976 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Ranger | 132 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 142 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2560 mm |