2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1979 Skoda L
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Skoda L would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1979 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1979 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 141 kg more than 1979 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ranger | 1979 Skoda L | |
Make | Ford | Skoda |
Model | Ranger | L |
Year Released | 2009 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1046 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 38 L |