2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1980 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Plymouth Reliant weights approximately 128 kg more than 2009 Ford Ranger.
Because 2009 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ranger | 1980 Plymouth Reliant | |
Make | Ford | Plymouth |
Model | Ranger | Reliant |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1022 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2260 mm |