2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1982 Audi 4000
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Audi 4000 has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2009 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Audi 4000 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ranger | 1982 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Ranger | 4000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2550 mm |