2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1982 Reliant Kitten
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Reliant Kitten. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Reliant Kitten would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1982 Reliant Kitten. (40 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 Reliant Kitten. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 431 kg more than 1982 Reliant Kitten. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Reliant Kitten. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Reliant Kitten.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ranger | 1982 Reliant Kitten | |
Make | Ford | Reliant |
Model | Ranger | Kitten |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 846 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 40 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2150 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 27 L |