2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1983 Lincoln Continental

To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1983 Lincoln Continental. (114 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1983 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 664 kg more than 2009 Ford Ranger.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ranger (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Lincoln Continental. (210 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Lincoln Continental.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Ford Ranger 1983 Lincoln Continental
Make Ford Lincoln
Model Ranger Continental
Year Released 2009 1983
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4015 cc 2443 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 207 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 323 Nm 210 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 3 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1022 kg 1686 kg
Vehicle Length 5180 mm 5120 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1690 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 3200 mm 2760 mm