2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1985 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (141 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 554 kg more than 1985 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ranger (330 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ranger | 1985 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Ranger | CJ |
Year Released | 2009 | 1985 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 85 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 150 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 1296 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2380 mm |