2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1987 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (143 HP) has 83 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 2009 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ranger (209 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Ranger | 1987 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Ranger | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1270 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2440 mm |
