2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1993 Mazda 626
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 626. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 626.
Because 1993 Mazda 626 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mazda 626 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ranger (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda 626. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ranger | 1993 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | 626 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1993 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 60 L |