2009 Ford Ranger vs. 1995 Rover MGF
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover MGF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover MGF would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover MGF (145 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ranger. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover MGF should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 326 kg more than 1995 Rover MGF.
Because 2009 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Rover MGF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ranger (330 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover MGF. (236 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover MGF.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Ranger | 1995 Rover MGF | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Ranger | MGF |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 145 HP |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Top Speed | 158 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 1524 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1280 mm |
